Skip to main content

Sustainable Living – One Step At A Time: Water Conservation

I want to apologize to my readers for not having posted anything in a long time. Ironically, working within the sustainable chemicals field sometimes makes posting about new topics even harder. I have become even more busy over the last couple of months. But my determination to keep this page going has strengthened even more since I have become a father. And the reason for this is simply that preserving the environment or at least helping to setup a frame-work that makes sustainable living possible in the future has become even more important to me now that my son was born.



So today, instead of talking about grand ideas, I will just be writing about efforts in my home that I have undertaken to reduce my families impact on the environment. My topic today: Water usage and water conservation. People often talk about a carbon footprint, but the water footprint is of at least equal importance. That's because although ~70% of the earth is covered in water, only 3% of that water is actually drinkable. Pollution and waste endanger this scarce resource - potable water. In dry and populated regions such as Southern California, water scarcity should be an even more important issue than it appears looking at the current mainstream media landscape.

Be it as it may, posts titled "Sustainable Living - One Step At A Time" are meant to give concrete steps of things individuals can do to make the world a better place. So let me share with you what I have done. All this was done over the last 11 months as my goal for this year was to make the house 33% more water efficient.

Let's start with taking inventory of what we had before the upgrades:
  • 3 bathroom faucets rated at 1.5 gpm
  • 2 showerheads rated at 2.5 gpm
  • 1 kitchen sink faucet rated at 2.5 gpm
  • 2 toilets rated at 1.6 gpm
  • 1 dish washer that doesn't get used.
  • 1 HE front-loading washing machine

The following water usage patterns arise assuming that:
  • 3 bathroom faucets each get used for 5 minutes per day (22.5 gallons)
  • 2 showerheads each get used 20 minutes per day (100 gallons)
  • 1 kitchen sink faucet gets used 20 minutes per day (50 gallons)
  • 2 toilets each get used 6 times per day (19.2 gallons)
  • Washing machine gets used 1 per day (14 gallons)
The total estimated water consumption per day then is 205.7 gallons of ~ 781.7 L. Scaled out to a month this equals to about 6171 gallons and about  74052 gallons per year. Just as a comparison, the average backyard pool holds about 15000 gallons. So the yearly water consumption before upgrades equals about 4.9 backyard swimming pools.

Over the past 11 months, I have made the following upgrades:

Replaced all 3 bathroom aerators with 1.0 gpm aerators
Replaced two showerheads with a 1.0 gpm and 1.25 gpm showerheads
Replaced the kitchen sink faucet with a 1.5 gpm rated faucet.
Replaced broken toilets with 1.0 and 0.8 gallons per flush HE or UHE toilets.
I have also convinced my mother-in-law to use the dishwasher once at the end of the day instead of washing everything after lunch and dinner.

What savings am I getting out of all these changes?

The following water usage patterns arise assuming that:
  • 3 bathroom faucets each get used for 5 minutes per day (15 gallons)
  • 2 showerheads each get used 20 minutes per day (45 gallons)
  • 1 kitchen sink faucet gets used 10 minutes per day (15 gallons)
  • 1 dish washer gets used once a day (6 gallons)
  • 2 toilets each get used 6 times per day (10.8 gallons)
  • Washing machine gets used 1 per day (14 gallons)
After the upgrades the estimated water usage per day is 105.8 gallons or ~402 L. This equals to 3174 gallons per month or 38088 gallons per year. So I have achieved a roughly 51.2% reduction in water consumption. In easy to see terms, I have cut the water consumption of my household down from 4 swimming pools down to 2.5 swimming pools.

How much of an improvement do these measurements make? According to an article by the Sierra club, the daily average per capita (person) public water consumption for San Francisco was 108 gallons in 2008. Compared to that the measures introduced here lead to a per capita use of just 24.75  gallons/day. I am surprised that the  numbers are so low given that I started out low already at 47.5 gallons/day. Perhaps this is due to the fact that I have not counted outdoor water usage.

There is only very little now that can be done in a cost-effective way. Replacing an already working toilet for $300-$400 (including labor) just to save another 0.2 gallons per flush is not feasible. The only other possibility to save more water is to replace the other showerhead down to a 1.0 gpm showerhead which would save another 5 gallons and through behavioral changes. Looking at what I sought to achieve though, I think for indoor water usage, I have achieved my goal. I emphasize indoor water usage because landscape irrigation in California is a much more significant source of water usage - especially in the dry summer months. This will be the next project I will work on over the coming year.

Update (2015-05-06): I have since further updated the following items in my house:

All showerheads are now 1.0 gpm showerheads.
All bathroom faucets now use 0.5 gpm.

These changes save an additional 15 gallons per day for the household.

Popular posts from this blog

Sustainable Living: Sunscreens

This is an important topic and so I want to get the most important things out of the way first:

Chemical sunscreens containing the following ingredients contribute to coral bleaching: 
OxybenzoneOctinoxateOctocrylene (used to also stabilize avobenzone)4-methylbenzylidine camphorAnything containing Parabens Don't be part of the problem and avoid using them! It's important to note that claims on sunscreens are not regulated and therefore, companies can put the wording "coral reef safe" on the packaging even though they contain the above chemicals. This is misleading if not outright false. Instead use "physical" sun screens that contain non-nanoparticle zink oxide. Physical sun screens differ from chemical sunscreens in that the sit ontop of the skin to reflect or scatter UVA/B rays away from the skin before it reaches it. Chemical sunscreens absorb the UVA/B rays instead to neutralize them.

To be clear, I am not proposing not using sunscreen! Instead use phys…

"Bio-based" Search Engines

I am still working on the second part of the focus on algae, and between research, and moving to a new place, I am not finding just enough time to flesh out the article just yet. It will come though!

Instead tonight, I wanted to write an informal entry on a particular aspect of "bio-based" ideas: what anyone can do for environmental protection and conservation. In most of the industrialized world and beyond, internet access is pervasive. I find that I am spending quite a bit of time on the internet be it for email, searching information, social networking or gaming. I am sure others will have their own habits on the internet.

It's easy to forget that each action on the internet actually has an environmental cost associated with it. The computers used to read this blog use electricity. Games can be demanding on the graphics card which if high-end can use even more energy than the CPU itself. Beyond the borders of your own computer, each action one takes puts a certain work-…

Focus on Algae - Part II: Energy

In the last focus section, we discussed how algae can be used to treat waste waters and mitigate CO2 in the process. Today's post will explore how algae can be used for energy generation. As already mentioned in the last time, biofuels have become very visible as of late due to environmental, economical and geopolitcal reasons. If at the heart of traditional biofuel generation lies in the creation and decomposition of biomass, then it would be easy to substitute corn or other less controversial land-based plants with algae. Although a lot of attention is paid to the use of algae in biofuel generation, and this article also mainly focusses on this aspect, it should be noted that algae can also be used to generate electricity by direct combustion of the biomass. Plans for these kinds of schemes are already on the way in Venice and a few other European locations [1].

Algae and Biofuels

What happens to the biomass after it has been created depends on the type of biofuel that is desired…