Skip to main content

Freely Speaking: Washington Post - Ariana Eunjung Cha: "Companies rush to build ‘bio-factories’ for medicines, flavorings and fuels"

By


As of late, Amyris has been in the news quite a bit. Another article surfaced in the Washington Post just a few days later titled "Companies rush to build ‘bio-factories’ for medicines, flavorings and fuels". For the most part, the article echoes the content found in the New York times article. However, I wanted to emphasize the following bits:



  1. First, I think the analogy of developing new apps on a phone being equal to making yeast produce new sustainable chemicals is quite a cute analogy. The reason: to get yeast to make these new substances does not take a complete rewrite of the yeast OS. A small fraction of the entire yeast genome was modifed to achieve the results we have been achieving. This leads me to the second point.
  2. The whole point of the app analogy is that we are not rewriting large parts of the yeast OS! Unfortunately, the author got a bit confused when she wrote:
    "Unlike traditional genetic engineering, which typically involves swapping a few genes, the scientists are building entire genomes from scratch."
    We are definitely not in the business of rebuilding genomes. There are other companies that are striving towards that goal (e.g.: Synthetic Genomics), but we are not doing that as far as I know. I think the whole point of our approach is rather that in contrast to  traditional genetic engineering which was manually very intensive so that typically one or a very small number of genes would have been manipulated, our technologies have been built to allow for large-scale, mostly automated, strain building. When it becomes possible to build thousands of strains per week, design paradigms like "build-test-learn" cycles become much more feasible. No longer, do we need to understand everything upfront. We can acknowledge that our understanding of the metabolic network is incomplete. Instead we build, test and learn from the many thousand constructs we can build.
  3. I need to read Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" which is credited to be in many ways the first book in the US that got the environmental movement started. There is supposed to be quote in there where she sees biotechnological solutions as a way to make peace with nature again. This was all the way back in 1962! When I find the exact quote, I will post that quote here as well.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Other Words: A Life on Our Planet

By
I just watched this documentary together with my son and my wife. Different from David's typical approach of sparse objective commentary, this documentary movie is a personal witness statement that David Attenborough is making describing how our planet has changed in his life time. It's compelling, and urgent but still hopeful.   Please, watch this documentary and share with your friends so they get the message!
3 comments
Read more

Permaculture: nature is still smarter than us

By
Permaculture In the year 2010, there are many aspects of humans' daily life that would lead us to believe that we have dominated nature. Unlike the thousands of other species that have gone extinct, we have settled and thrived in almost every environment and every continent on this planet, aside from Antarctica. We have eradicated diseases like smallbox and subdued other diseases which previously decimated our populations on a massive scale (see The Black Death in the 1300s and Columbus' “discovery of the Americas in 1492). We have created chemicals that allow us to blast weeds and insects into submission and thereby cultivate thousands of acres of the same species on farmland; an environment that would be impossible in nature. But nature is still smarter than us. A lot smarter. And we still have much to learn from its processes. Permaculture is the idea of mimicking the ways that ecosystems work in the context of essential human activities: house and settlement design, farming...
3 comments
Read more

Freely-Speaking: Quick note on bio-based antennaes

By
With my thesis defense coming up this Monday, I really did not have as much time to share all the interesting things I came across lately. But I did not want to miss the chance to make a quick note to myself and the readers of this site of an interesting paper, titled "DNA-based programming of quantum dot valency, self-assembly and luminescence" just published in Nature Nanotechnology . Grigory Tikhomirov et al. report "the self-assembly of quantum dot complexes using cadmium telluride nanocrystals capped with specific sequences of DNA. Quantum dots with between one and five DNA-based binding sites are synthesized and then used as building blocks to create a variety of rationally designed assemblies, including cross-shaped complexes containing three different types of dots...Through changes in pH, the conformation of the complexes can also be reversibly switched, turning on and off the transfer of energy between the constituent quantum dots." In other w...
3 comments
Read more